Thursday, January 24, 2008

Hillary Clinton

The Candidate submitted questionnaire and statement.

1. Do you support sending direct U.S. government aid to Cuban dissidents?

Yes___X__ No______

2. Do you support the ability to send direct private aid to Cuban dissidents?

Yes___X__ No______

3. Do you support Radio and Television Martí as a vehicle for providing objective news and information to Cuba?

Yes__X_ No______

4. Do you support restrictions on American tourist travel to Cuba?

Yes___X__ No______

5. Do you support restrictions on Cuban-American family, humanitarian related travel to Cuba?

Please also see statement.
Yes_____ No___X___

6. Do you believe that the United States should negotiate with Raul Castro once it is announced that Fidel Castro has died?

Yes_____ No__X__

7. Should the United States require a new Cuban government to make concessions such as freeing political prisoners or allowing a free press before the United States moves to negotiate with them?

Yes__X__ No______

8. Do you support maintaining current restrictions on trade with Cuba until there is a transition to democracy?

Yes__X__ No______

9. Do you believe the wet-foot/dry-foot policy should be reverted back to the original policy of accepting Cuban refugees into the United States for processing regardless of whether they reach dry land or are intercepted at sea?

Yes_____ No__X___

10. Should United States policy provide for increased assistance for independent Cuban civil society, i.e. independent entrepreneurs, medical clinics, libraries, etc.?

Yes__X__ No______

11. Do you believe in supporting the growth of independent micro-enterprises in Cuba with the goal of helping promote independent Cuban civil society?

Yes__X__ No______

12. Do you believe the United States should negotiate direct mail service to Cuba?

Yes__X__ No______

13. Do you believe U.S. policy should allow for the upgrade of telecommunications equipment in order to facilitate communication between the people of Cuba and their relatives abroad?

Yes__X__ No______

14. Which statement most closely reflects your views on current U.S.-Cuba policy? (you may choose more than one)
I believe current policy is effective and does not need any change___

I believe current policy is effective but is missing a proactive element in support of Cuba’s dissidents___

I believe U.S. policy is not restrictive enough and should be toughened___

I believe U.S. policy is too restrictive and some elements of it should be relaxed___

I believe U.S. policy towards Cuba is a failure and should be completely revised___
Please see statement

15. Do you believe it is important to establish an International Democracy Fund for Cuba through an international or regional body like the U.N. or the O.A.S. in order to provide incentives for democratic change?

Yes__X___ No________

16. Please summarize (1-2 paragraphs) your vision for a U.S.-Cuba policy under your Administration.

Democracy, human rights, and the fundamental freedoms all nations of the hemisphere, including the United States, have struggled to protect, will form the foundation of my policy toward Cuba when I am President of the United States.

Over the last quarter century we have seen an unprecedented movement toward democracy and respect for fundamental rights across the world. Cuba, unfortunately, has remained under one-party rule, under a regime and a leadership that is responsible for terrible human rights abuses and political oppression that has held back 11 million talented and hardworking citizens of the Americas. The Cuban people deserve better.

I believe that this is not the time or place to consider wholesale or broad changes to our Cuba policy, including the embargo. The American people must let the Cuban people know that we are on their side in their struggle for freedom and democracy. We can do this by supporting brave voices for freedom like Oswaldo Paya and the Damas de Blanco. The Castro dictatorship has divided Cuban families for nearly half a century. I have voted to support flexibility to allow visits for immediate family members in humanitarian cases. Such ties give hope to the Cuban people and to their families in the diaspora. And they send a message that the American people recognize that the Cuban people, not their repressive government, represent the promise and possibility for a democratic future.

Likewise, supporting other humanitarian measures that will help bring direct material and moral support to Cuban civil society will help the Cuban people gain the confidence and independence to imagine a society free of repression, one in which freedom and social justice, two core values of the Cuban nation for centuries, can exist side by side.

During my presidency, I hope there may be an opportunity to undertake a review of our policy toward Cuba, because there may be changes and fundamental reforms that merit a new approach. Now, however, is not a time for unilateral steps such as lifting the embargo. We must retain a policy of support for the Cuban people, without strengthening the Cuban regime.

10 comments:

ramonp said...

Not bad Hillary, Not bad

toys r us said...

i am surprised--in a good way! To listen to some radio in Miami you would think Hillary would shake hands with Raul Castro tomorrow if she could. This really clears it up for me. I think her response it thoughtful and intelligent.Go Hil! I may vote for you after all!

a Cuban in Washington DC said...

I won't for her at all. When you see her talking she looks like a pupet repeting "frases hechas". I don't like her to the presidency. Same all, same all.

Giancarlo said...

Just a question:

How would the Clinton administration convey its message to a post-Fidel Cuba if it refuses to hold bilateral talks with the next government?

pinareno said...

Giancarlo-
The US has well-established means of communicating with the Cuban leadership despite no official diplomatic relations. How else do you explain the 1994 Cuban immigration accords where the US Coast Guard was tasked with returning Cuban refugees to Cuba ? If talk becomes necessary it will happen. With Raulito in place, there is no need to talk about anything without concessions from the dictatorship.

ei said...

Will you appease Castro like your Husband Bill Clinton? Remember Elian Gonzalez? Many of us still do.

Elian Gonzalez Siezed by Clinton & Reno: http://youtube.com/watch?v=AgaacrxsS4c

Cuban Community Reaction:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=oYiMXChId4s

Anonymous said...

As a Cuban-American I believe that our government should change few of its policy toward Cuba, such the embargo that from its political propuse have not been working for many years. Such those nonesense restrictions to the american citizens to travel freely to Cuba as a constitutional right as citizens of this country. Such the restriction to Cubans living in this country to travel freely to Cuba as many times as we want and to send money to those family members that many os us still have in Cuba. I believe that Castro have divided our family for many years; we don't need the US government to help him by doing the same in this country also. Thanks.

Manuel A.Tellechea said...

The Cuban-American National Foundation is not what it used to be. Maybe it never was. But everybody knows that already, and if one has any doubts then its use of "migrants" to describe Cuban refugees on its website should dispel all illusions. It seems, ironically, that only it is only Democratic politicians who still take CANF seriously, having believed from the first every calumny that was ever levelled against it in its heyday, they still see it as the "black hand" of the exile community and accord it more importance than it retains. The Republicans don't see it as a menace or an asset. They either know better or take the support of Cuban exiles for granted and need no intermediary.

The CANF sent the presidential candidates a survey with 15 specific questions on various aspects of U.S.-Cuba relations, such as the trade embargo and the "Wet Foot/Dry Foot" policy. The only candidates to actually answer the questionnaire were Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. None of the Republican candidates did. Instead, they submitted canned statements on Cuba which avoided answering any of the questions in the questionnaire, which is a feat that defies the rule of probabilities but which, nonetheless, every Republican candidate managed to pull off (including those who ignored the survey).

We can only assume that their positions are more liberal than Hillary's, whose only unacceptable response was her support for the "Wet Foot/Dry Foot" policy (which all candidates share in common). This is frightening. Hillary Clinton, at least on paper, is more supportive of la causa than her Republican opponents! Of course, paper will hold anything and her positions may well change for the worse after the election. In fact, I'll bet on it. Still, I find it amazing that the Republicans no longer feel the need to cater to us, or, if you will, lie to us in order to secure our support. They are clearly saying that they know what is best for Cuba and feel no compulsion to share their "vision" with us. This is more than disrespect; it is disregard.

http://reviewofcuban-americanblogs.blogspot.com

scuttlbut said...

I am disappointed in Hillary. America is the only country that has embargoed Cuba. When Hillary speaks of "Democracy, human rights, and the fundamental freedoms all nations of the hemisphere, including the United States, have struggled to protect, will form the foundation of my policy toward Cuba when I am President of the United States," she sounds like Bush-Cheney when they were pushing us into attacking Iraq. Why can't we allow people to live in peace?

Anonymous said...

ayyy

mis amigos,

If you don't like what is happening in Cuba, pack your bags and go back and fight! Stop your bellyaching and DO something--oh sorry, you like having your freedom here and your nice jobs....if YOU are not part of the solution then YOU are part of the problem